Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
C
CrysFML2008
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Scientific Software
CrysFML2008
Merge requests
!47
Implement degree-valued trigonometric functions and standardise code according to Fortran2008
Code
Review changes
Check out branch
Download
Patches
Plain diff
Closed
Implement degree-valued trigonometric functions and standardise code according to Fortran2008
nagfor
into
master
Overview
2
Commits
15
Pipelines
4
Changes
42
Closed
Andrew Sazonov
requested to merge
nagfor
into
master
6 months ago
Overview
2
Commits
15
Pipelines
4
Changes
42
Expand
Implement degree-valued trigonometric functions
Can be activated with
-fdec-math
for gfortran, but not available for nagfor
Standardize by using int64 from iso_fortran_env instead of kind=8
kind=8 is not recognized by nagfor. integer(kind=8) -> integer(int64)
kind=4 is not recognized by nagfor. integer(kind=4) -> integer
Real(kind=8) -> Real(kind=dp)
kind=8 is not recognized by nagfor
Use newer get_command_argument() instead of getarg()
call flush() -> flush()
Beginning with the Fortran 2003 standard, there is a FLUSH statement that should be preferred over the FLUSH intrinsic.
Temp solution: sizeof(z(1,1,1)) -> kind(z(1,1,1))
sizeof is not recognised by nagfor
0
0
Merge request reports
Activity
All activity
Filter activity
Deselect all
Approvals
Assignees & reviewers
Comments (from bots)
Comments (from users)
Commits & branches
Edits
Labels
Lock status
Mentions
Merge request status
Tracking
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Please
register
or
sign in
to reply
Loading